Will give you the error message you have been seeing Trying the following command git push origin redactor_changes You can no longer push redactor_changes to the remote. This is a good thing (potentially), because it means the reviewer can just fast-forward the master branch with your changes (no merge commit). Rebasing succeeded in bringing in the new commits from master but it did so by rewriting the history of your redactor_changes branch. You will end up with the following diagram master: A - B - D Now if you run the following commands git checkout redactor_changes Since then, you have made one commit to redactor_changes ( C)and someone else has made a commit to the master branch ( D). This simple diagram assumes that you branched off master at the B commit. To explain by way of diagram: master: A - B - D Note that my push command work if I don't rebase it with master, but owner of the remote git would still see the conflict when he tries to merge my branch (redactor_changes) onto master.Įvery time you rebase your redactor_changes branch on master, you are bringing the latest changes from the latter branch into the former branch. Īs suggested by git and SO, I go on the pull the changes on my remote branch to my local branch ( redactor_changes). Then I push my branch again to origin, it showed me same error, !. When I rebase my branch with master(locally), it throws some conflicts which I then manually fix and do a rebase -continue. Hint: See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push -help' for details. % git checkout redactor_changes redactor_changes (non-fast-forward)Įrror: failed to push some refs to ' hint: Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind I ran following commands few days ago to push my changes to remote branch. Please do ask me a clarification if I lack any detail. The result is again a single line of history with no branches and merges.īecause the commits had to be re-applied and conflicts potentially resolved, the actual commits will change, a new commit-id generated etc.I am not a git expert. etc etc until all commits from the branch have been "moved"/"replayed" on the other branch. So fast-forward isn't possible in this case.īut you can rebase E.I onto K: *A-*B-*C-*D-*J-*K-*E'-*F'-*G'-*H'-*I' MAIN | BRANCHīut what happens is that a new commit is made containing the changes of E and appended to main, then a new commit is made with the changes of F and appended to main. Then you can't fast-forward merge E.I into main, since J.K are in the way. When you are ahead as well as behind of MAIN: *E-*F-*G-*H-*I BRANCH The end result is the same: *A-*B-*C-*D-*E-*F-*G-*H-*I MAIN | BRANCH When you rebase each commit of the branch is moved after the head of MAIN. When you do a fast forward merge the main pointer is moved forward to the tip of the branch. When you're ahead of main: *E-*F-*G-*H-*I BRANCH But in that case, you can rebase, creating new commits based on the commits that are ahead of main. If you're ahead and behind main, then a fast-forward merge isn't possible, since there are newer commits on master. When you are ahead of main, both do the same thing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |